Have to reduce your paper? Proteins have different functions which can be exactly controlled.

Have to reduce your paper? Proteins have different functions which can be exactly controlled.

By admin
Post date

Recently, I became expected to greatly help an writer shorten a paper by 10% to meet up the word-count demands associated with the target log. The paper had been quite quick and contained little extraneous information. Nonetheless, using the methods illustrated right right right here with instance sentences, I accomplished the job without eliminating such a thing crucial. Consider the after sentences:

You are able to reduce this in 2 methods. First, revise to stress the crucial point, which when you look at the context associated with the paper was not the range of protein functions however the accurate control over those functions. Second, eradicate the unnecessary phrase that is prepositional use “protein function” not “functions of proteins.”

Protein function is precisely managed.

(2) The launch and activation for the proteins had been controlled by…

Once again, expel unneeded phrases that are prepositional “of the proteins.”

Protein launch and activation had been controlled by…

(3) The latest analysis practices be able to profile all of the proteins produced during a given duration.

Right right Here, you can easily change a expression having a word that is single use “permit” in the place of “make it feasible.”

The analysis methods that are latest allow profiling of the many proteins produced within a offered duration.

(4) there is absolutely no method that is general managing the timing and location of task of proteins within cells.

right Here it is possible to expel a phrase that is expletive“there is”) and employ succinct terminology: “spatiotemporal control” versus “controlling the timing and location.” Jargon has its own uses!

A method that is general spatiotemporal control over protein task within cells is lacking.

(5) Nanoparticles have now been effectively utilized to hold probe molecules into cells.

Eliminate redundant terms, “successfully” in cases like this. “Used” implies success; one could never say “nanoparticles have already been unsuccessfully utilized.”

Nanoparticles have now been utilized to transport probe particles into cells.

(6) the idea of irradiation coincided with all the point of which the alteration in morphology began, suggesting that the alteration in morphology ended up being initiated by…

Once again, expel unneeded prepositional expressions, and don’t repeat terms unnecessarily: the 2nd instance of “change” doesn’t need a modifier to point that you’re talking about the morphological modification.

The irradiation point coincided with all the point of which the morphological modification began, suggesting that the alteration had been initiated by…

(7) Nanoparticles had been ready containing proteins, additionally the nanoparticles had been utilized as companies associated with proteins into cells.

Turn an element phrase (two topics, two verbs) as a sentence that is simple a single topic (“nanoparticles”) and a mixture predicate (“were prepared and used”).

Nanoparticles proteins that are containing ready and utilized to transport the proteins into cells.

(8) Enzyme activity had been minimal before irradiation, whereas strong enzyme task ended up being seen after irradiation

Once more, replace a compound sentence with a easy phrase. In addition, delete “was observed” and just state what was seen: “strong enzyme activity had been observed” becomes “enzyme activity…was strong.”

Enzyme task had been minimal before irradiation but strong after irradiation.

(9) Changing the concentration that is reagent in a modification of how big is the nanoparticles: a higher reagent concentration produced smaller nanoparticles.

right Here it is possible to change two statements—one basic plus one specific—with an individual statement that is specific. Don’t declare that an alteration took place and then explain the alteration; merely describe the change:

Increasing the reagent concentration reduced the nanoparticle size.

(10) within the images that are merged right after irradiation (Fig. 1, remaining panels) and 24 h later (Fig. 1, right panels), the fluorescence ended up being visible.

Don’t immediately repeat figure numbers, and omit the term “panels,” which can be usually unneeded.

When you look at the images that are merged right after irradiation (Fig. 1, left) and 24 h later on (right), the fluorescence ended up being noticeable.

(11) each time a spot that is smallsuggested by the red group in Fig. 1) ended up being irradiated…

“Indicated by the” is unneeded right here.

Each time a spot that is smallred circle, Fig. 1) was irradiated…

Observe that none associated with sentences that are original grammatical incorrect, and under normal circumstances, no revisions could be needed. But, whenever concision is just a concern, theses forms of changes may come in handy.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *